LD 0: Heidelberg Catechism Introduction for 2011
December 26, 2010 1 Comment
Thankfully, I’ve already made my way through the catechism’s concluding section on the Lord’s Prayer, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Now it’s on to the rest of the catechism where I should have begun from the outset (I couldn’t wait to properly start in January so I just had to pick it up mid year in September 2010). Well…
- If you’re rusty on your Christian doctrine, then stick with me each week. If at the very least stop by just to read the Heidelberg Catechism for a refresher; trust me, that alone will be worth a weekly glance.
- If you’re new to Reformed Theology, then my brief surveys of the Heidelberg Catechism’s Lord’s Days will give you a good primer on what I’m convinced is the most biblically faithful theological system.
- If you’re new to Christianity, then you’ll get a firmer grip on what the Christian gospel is. I can’t give you anything better in this life than a clearer picture of the gospel.
Hopefully it’ll be worth your time. Now on to an overview of the HC:
Guilt, Grace, and Gratitude
Guilt, Grace and Gratitude (or Law, Gospel, and Sanctification) sum up the Heidelberg Catechism. This is also the cycle the Christian will repeatedly experience all the days of his life until he goes home where he will experience eternal Glory. This threefold partition of the HC takes you through the entire calendar year. HC#2 structures the remainder of the catechism for us:
2. How many things are necessary for you to know, that in this comfort you may live and die happily?
Three things: the first, how great my sin and misery is; the second, how I am redeemed from all my sins and misery; the third, how I am to be thankful to God for such redemption.
So here’s the catechism’s self-determined outline:
- Lord’s Days 2-4 (#3-11) concern our Guilt before God
- Lord’s Days 5-31 (#12-85) concern our Grace from God
- Lord’s Days 32-52 (#86-129) concern our Gratitude towards God
The HC is tidy and clear, perfect for reflection and instruction. This is why the catechism has been front and center at my site; perhaps a more appropriate tagline over the present “deacons likewise must be…” should be “gratitude through reflection and instruction.” My goal is to serve as a deacon out of the overflow of the Spirit’s work in me through His Word. A Deacon’s Life was always meant to be both reflective and instructional.
If guilt, grace, and gratitude, don’t tug at your heart, then how about looking a little deeper into outline of the HC? Broken up another way, here are the major sections:
FIRST PART OF MAN’S MISERY
SECOND PART OF MAN’S REDEMPTION
- THE APOSTLES’ CREED
- OF GOD THE FATHER
- OF GOD THE SON
- OF GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT
- THE SACRAMENTS
- OF HOLY BAPTISM
- OF THE HOLY SUPPER
THIRD PART OF THANKFULNESS
- THE LAW OF GOD (TEN COMMANDMENTS)
- PRAYER (LORD’S PRAYER)
I get excited at how far reaching the HC is. Wouldn’t you like to have a firmer grasp on all these topics (like the Apostles’ Creed, the Ten Commandments, and the Lord’s Prayer)? All of this never gets old to me; I read it over and over and over again. Many desire to memorize all the questions and answers, but few actually do. Unfortunately, I’m a part of the many, but I hope to change that one day and be a part of the few. Still, this is pretty much my passion, even if I’m awful at memorization.
I would challenge you to take a good look at the HC for 2011 (actually every year for that matter!). For this reason, I recommend Kevin DeYoung’s The Good News We Almost Forgot. It’s basic and brief, so it won’t be too much to handle.
Here’s the author’s dedication:
To Ian, Jacob, Elsie, and Paul,
Daddy loves you more than you know.
I hope you grow up to like the Heidelberg Catechism half as much as I do.
Nice little coincidence that Jacob and Paul are members of his family. You have no idea how much I wish this upon my family too! Join me this year.

Gratitude Must Be Taught
December 31, 2010 Leave a comment
Call it providence. When Pastor Jeff sent out an email asking for someone to lead our EM in prayer tonight, there it was: prayer of thankfulness. This is exactly what’s been on my mind for the last couple of months as I went through the Lord’s Prayer in the gratitude section of the HC. When I started reading Ursinus’ HC commentary this week, I was struck by his concluding paragraph on Lord’s Day 1. He writes this:
When you think about this, it shouldn’t be striking, but it was to me. I always tell Jacob to say, “Thank you,” when it’s appropriate. I think nothing of teaching him to do so; it’s just something I need to do as his dad. Then why does it shock me that gratitude needs to be taught (to me)? Yes, a huge part of me thinks it should come from the Spirit’s work in the overflow of your heart. But, Ursinus is right. It needs to be taught explicitly and directly, because fools like me don’t think they need instruction on gratitude. Naturally, then, I cease to be thankful if I abandon its instruction. Ursinus is right: my thinking and reasoning are way off.
So yes, thankfulness must be taught from the Word, because our sinfulness blinds us to God and His goodness. Gratitude will only overflow where the Word of God is the authority. There is no growth apart from the Spirit’s use of the Word and the Word of God is saturated with our gratitude towards God. This we must be taught.
Filed under Book Reflection, Gratitude, Heidelberg Catechism Commentary, Zacharias Ursinus